Court rules to end gambling monopolies
A second landmark ruling on gambling, the ‘Placanica case’, puts pressure on EU member states to change their national laws restricting access to provision of sports-betting services.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled on 6 March 2007 in the Placanica case, that “the Italian criminal penalties for the collecting of bets by intermediaries acting on behalf of foreign companies are contrary to Community law”.
The Placanica case involves the British sports betting company Stanley Leisure plc, the three Italian operators of which, Placanica, Palazzese and Sorricchio were charged in Italian courts with pursuing organised bet-collection activity without the required police authorisation, but obtaining such authorisation was impossible.
The Italian Courts referred the cases to the ECJ to verify wheter the Italian legislation on betting and gambling was compatible with the Community principles of freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services.
The ECJ stated: “A member state may not apply a criminal penalty for failure to complete an administrative formality where, in breach of Community law, such completion is refused or rendered impossible by that member state.”
Stanley International Betting Ltd, a company operating in international sports betting: “This judgement reinforces the historic 2003 ‘Gambelli’ case-law ruling on freedom to provide cross-border services in sports betting.” The company is now calling on the European Commission to act by enforcing this settled law and for government and regulators to fully apply it.
European Betting Association (EBA), an association of leading European gambling operators, believes that with the Placanica ruling the legal position of regulated European-licensed operators has been further clarified and that all the necessary guidance now exists to enable governments to revisit their policies in this area. The EBA hopes that governments looking for long-term solutions that are compliant with European law protect the interests of consumers and enable a regulated European industry to develop in partnership with governments as opposed to in conflict with them, now see and seize the opportunity for a dialogue with the industry.
European States Lotteries and Toto Association, an independent European association composed of State Lottery and Toto companies established in Europe welcomes the ECJ judgment as it “recognises that member states can decide to limit gambling and betting activities through a licensing system with a single or multiple operators and whereby the licensee(s) must be able to make a sufficiently attractive offer including advertising and the use of new distribution methods to execute its channelling task. (see §55 of the judgement).”
MEP Christofer Fjellner (Sweden, EPP-ED): “The ruling is expressively clear and sends clear message to all stakeholders: companies, Commission and member states. To the member states, the message is ‘You have to change your own legislation, or we will do it for you’. And to the Commission, they have to enforce the Treaty”.
The gambling verdict was warmly welcomed by another MEP Malcolm Harbour, the EPP-ED Group Spokesperson and Internal Market Coordinator. “Many EU countries are openly flouting internal market rules and discriminating against legitimate and well-managed sports-betting activities, including major UK operators. The Placanica case brings us closer to creating a genuine single market also in the gambling sector,” he said, adding that “member states cannot, on the one hand, incite and encourage people to participate in their own state sponsored gambling activities, while at the same time invoking consumer protection as a reason to suppress sports betting”
Notícia: euractiv
.
.
REGULAÇÃO
Em boa hora enviámos para a Comissão Europeia o entendimento que norteia o nosso trabalho desde 2004
Entendemos que devem ser elaborados estudos em prestigiadas universidades, em cooperação com operadores e reguladores, recorrendo às bases de registos dos jogos na internet para estudar com precisão os comportamentos e os hábitos dos jogadores. Os resultados destes estudos podem proporcionar uma base empírica à comunidade científica internacional na área da investigação em comportamentos de dependência
Entendemos que devem ser lançadas campanhas maciças de educação, através de diversos canais de comunicação, com o objectivo de chegar efectivamente a toda a população, de maneira que esta possa perceber que existe uma verdadeira politica europeia em relação ao jogo e que as condições para um exercício responsável da actividade estão dadas
Sublinhamos a necessidade de criar observatórios do jogo que alertem e informem os consumidores sobre as práticas de cada operador. Estes observatórios poderão ser um incentivo para a implementação de boas práticas nos seus sítios de jogo online. A diferenciação positiva. A transparência dos operadores poderá traduzir-se num capital de confiança junto dos jogadores.
Entendemos que deverão ser criadas redes de assistência para jogadores compulsivos, começando pelos centros que já estão a trabalhar no tratamento das adições. Esses centros deverão funcionar sobre uma plataforma tecnológica adequada que permita o intercâmbio de experiências, a actualização de conhecimentos e a colaboração mútua.
DESDE 2004
EDUCAÇÃO/PREVENÇÃO
O programa Jogo Responsável deverá contribuir para assegurar a protecção dos indivíduos, e da sociedade em geral, das consequências negativas do jogo e apostas a dinheiro e simultaneamente proteger o direito de quem pretende jogar.
Visite os nossos sítios:
Leave A Response
- You must be logged in to post a comment.


































